Categories
- Accounting
- advertising
- Arts and Crafts
- Automotive
- books
- books online
- business
- Careers
- childrens books
- christian books
- Clothes & Accessories
- Computers & Software
- cooking
- Diet and Fitness
- education
- Electronics
- family
- fiction books
- Finance
- Food and Beverages
- Gifts and Holidays
- Health & Beauty
- Home & Garden
- Jewelery & Watches
- Kids & Games
- Legal
- Marketing
- Media & Entertainment
- mystery books
- new books
- Office
- Oil & Gas
- paperback books
- pets
- publishing books
- Real Estate
- Science
- Services
- Sports & Recreation
- Toys & Games
- Travel
- used books
Pages
Tags
Austin
author
bible
book
books
brave
chapter
children's
childrens books
christian
discussion
fiction
god
History
Hole
How
in
Islam
jesus
Moon
mystery
New
of
online
planet
Press
publishing
Rabbit
reading
Recap
religion
review
Saga
Star
technology
Texas
The
To
Trailer
tv
Twilight
video
world
writing
Xulon
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
Meta
|
A panel (William Lane Craig, Christopher Hitchens, Douglas Wilson, Lee Strobel) discusses if the God of Christianity exists and if it matters. The discourse took place in March, 2009 at the Christian Book Expo.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
imagine a giant …
imagine a giant puzzle. You know, the kind with 2000 pieces. The pieces are US. When you put them together you have the face/personality of “God”. And everything else is bullshit.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Well, perhaps. …
Well, perhaps. Refutation is to prove false or erroneous, by argument. Debunk is to expose or ridicule the falseness of a claim/argument. The website I mentioned does both; to Craig’s silly arguments and many other arguments theists have put forward through the years.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Yes, I realised it …
Yes, I realised it was him after I posted.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
@wrongwayup you are …
@wrongwayup you are confusing refutation with debunking…
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
@wrongwayup You …
@wrongwayup You mean Dr. William Lane Craig
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
The speaker that …
The speaker that talks after Hitchens *literally* uses *every* argument for god that have already been debunked. For example, they are all on wiki . ironchariots . o r g, all with extensive refutations.
MAJOR FAIL.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
If God exists …
If God exists outside of space and time, now where could that possibly be…?
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
“It’s possible …
“It’s possible fairies exists”
Dude just watch what you slip off your tongue. Or i’m gonna F’ing torture the troll spirits out off you. You are on edge of blasphemy with that *quoted above*.
Afairyists should be punished.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
These christian …
These christian people only give assumptions…not real facts. Ik can also say that the universe began with a god and godess having sex…but this doesn’t make it true.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Ok, so since it’s …
Ok, so since it’s possible God exists, then you can’t dismiss it. Well then why are people ignoring these possibilities:
It’s possible that Santa exists
It’s possible Superman exists
It’s possible unicorns exists
It’s possible fairies exists
it’s possible a flying spaghetti monster exists
It’s possible vampires exists
it’s possible werewolves exists
It’s possible Bugs Bunny exists
IT’S POSSIBLE THAT EVERY SUPERNATURAL THING EVER CONCEIVED EXISTS
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
good video up until …
good video up until 5:38. after that it was shithouse.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
But God isn’t a …
But God isn’t a morally perfect being, even if we grant his existence.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Hitchens should …
Hitchens should just say
“i don’t know what created the universe, but just because it is an unknown i am not going to give credit to the nearest deity.”
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Then you and …
Then you and hitchens are one in the same, except for the wit, of course.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Fat man waddling …
Fat man waddling past at 6:49 sums up the fool on Hitchen’s right.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Oh yep good one.
Oh yep good one.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Mentally inept? ” …
Mentally inept? “kind of hope of?” Use the spell check and ‘try’ not to look like such a dumbass. Saying YT is a heaven for posters to have hope of legitimacy, then make your own post attempting to gain the same legitimacy you’ve shown such disdain for? Hypocrite much?
Shew fly, don’t bother me.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Youtube seems to be …
Youtube seems to be a haven for mentally inept jesters like you to have some kind of hope of legitamcy in a fraction of the useless garbage you spout.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Hitchens is so …
Hitchens is so ignorant, limited, and earth bound. If it weren’t for his wit, he wouldn’t have any supporters. Luckily he can toss a funny or two out once and while and retain his dopey comedy central educated audience.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Can you blame …
Can you blame anyone of them? After the postulation of such absurd, beyond doubt assertions made by every religious practice known to man as if they were demonstrable fact. Then to say they have authority over YOU because they have God on their side? Are you suggesting Muslims have the RIGHT to kill you if you break the rules of THEIR holy book? Do you see the reason for the animosity? How angry does it make you feel to know that there are people who believe they have divine authority over you?
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
You know what, …
You know what, you’re absolutely right. Im sorry, I kinda lost it a bit. I just feel strongly about what I believe, and I see so much animosity towards Christians on YT.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Do you even read …
Do you even read your posts before you post them? After that diatribe you really want to talk about decency and politeness?
Don’t worry, you sound just like every other banana man fundie that posts here on YT. But since you’re all about justifications, how can you postulate the existence of an indemonstrable entity solely on faith?
Give up the “hope” of something else after you live here and start living this life, I assure having one life to live increases it’s meaning & value 100 times over
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
Its amazing how you …
Its amazing how you athiests cant find a drop of decency and politeness when you talk to others about truth.
You all sound like mini-Dickie Dawkins and are as lost as him too. I truly pity you.
Im amazed you dont have your heads buried in study trying to find your way past the problem that you CANNOT justify ANYTHING in a universe of chance and accident. Poor you.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
I’m going to call a …
I’m going to call a spade a spade; christians are idiots.
January 16th, 2010 at 2:50 am
And you’re side …
And you’re side stepping the original issue. So I’ll try and steer you back in the right direction.
If you can prove, without logical fallacies, that the universe was created, you’d prove that there was a creator.